Three Adjoining Lots on Cheryl Lane: A $12,500 Land Listing in Lumberton, Mississippi

A residential land listing can attract attention for several reasons: its location, its size, the flexibility of its layout, or the possibility of shaping a place around personal priorities.

On Cheryl Lane in Lumberton, Mississippi, three adjoining lots are offered together at a listed price of $12,500. The property description places them in Catfish Lake Unit II and reports a combined area of approximately 0.57 acres.

That is an important detail because one version of the listing displays a conflicting figure of 60 acres. The written description and other retrieved listings support the smaller combined acreage, not a sixty-acre tract.

The property is described as unimproved residential land, with some previous clearing, electricity available, and convenient access to Interstate 59. A well and septic system would be needed.

For readers exploring smaller land parcels, this listing offers a starting point for considering how location, utilities, site planning, and community arrangements fit together.

The Property at a Glance

The following details summarize the supplied listing information.

Feature	Reported information
Listing address	NHN Cheryl Lane, Lumberton, MS 39455
Asking price	$12,500
Configuration	Three adjoining lots
Combined area	Approximately 0.57–0.578 acres
Advertised individual dimensions	60 × 140 feet
Property type	Residential land / unimproved land
Previous work	Some clearing reported
Electricity	Reported available
Water and wastewater	Well and septic would be needed
Parcel number supplied	1157250001307700
Reported annual taxes	$27
Listing agent	Janell Billiot
Brokerage	MS Real Estate Now, LLC
MLS number	149367

These details help establish what is being described. Exact boundaries, service arrangements, taxes, and permitted uses would require confirmation through the relevant property records and providers.

Understanding the Acreage Discrepancy

The acreage conflict should be addressed before discussing the property’s possibilities.

The description states that each of the three lots measures 60 feet by 140 feet.

Using those advertised dimensions, each lot would contain 8,400 square feet. Three such lots would total 25,200 square feet, equivalent to approximately 0.578 acres.

That calculation is consistent with the written description’s reference to roughly 0.57 acres.

It is not consistent with a sixty-acre property.

Dimensions in a listing remain approximate until checked against the relevant records or survey. However, they provide a clear reason to avoid using the larger number in promotional material.

For this feature, the land is therefore discussed as three adjoining lots totaling approximately 0.57 acres, with the exact area left for documentary confirmation.

Why Three Adjoining Lots Can Be Appealing

The side-by-side configuration gives this listing a particular identity.

Instead of one isolated lot, the offering includes three neighboring pieces of land sold together. That arrangement may interest someone who wants to consider the outdoor space as a whole.

It could allow a prospective owner to explore a more coordinated layout than they might consider on a single narrow parcel.

However, three lots do not automatically mean three approved building sites. Nor does owning them together establish whether they can be treated as one combined site for every purpose.

Those questions depend on the recorded configuration and the intended project.

The appeal is the opportunity to investigate the arrangement thoughtfully, rather than assume a particular development outcome from the number of lots alone.

A Smaller Parcel With a More Focused Scale

Approximately half an acre presents a different kind of opportunity from a large rural tract.

The interest may lie in a manageable project rather than extensive land maintenance or large-scale outdoor activity.

For someone considering a residential concept, the relationship between a possible building, access, utility needs, and remaining outdoor space would become especially important.

The size encourages priorities.

Which parts of the vision are essential? How much outdoor space does the owner actually want to maintain? Would a simpler plan suit the intended use better?

Those questions can make a smaller property easier to evaluate.

The goal would not be to fit every possible idea onto the land. It would be to identify a layout that works comfortably within the parcel’s confirmed characteristics.

Location in the Lumberton Area

The listing places the property on Cheryl Lane in the Lumberton area.

Its description also emphasizes access to Interstate 59, presenting the location as convenient for reaching the wider road network.

That is useful context, although no independently established journey time is provided here.

Accessibility means different things to different people. A location that suits occasional visits may need a different evaluation from one intended for daily commuting or frequent appointments.

The practical question is how the property relates to someone’s actual destinations.

For a residential land feature, the location’s appeal is strongest when considered alongside the intended lifestyle. The address provides a starting point, while a visit and route review would show how that location functions in everyday terms.

Some Previous Clearing Is Reported

The supplied description notes that portions of the property were previously cleared.

That information suggests that some work has occurred, but it does not establish the current condition of every part of the land.

Vegetation can change, and the extent of earlier clearing is not specified.

It would therefore be premature to describe the lots as fully cleared, graded, or ready for construction.

A site visit could help clarify what remains open and what may need attention. It could also reveal whether existing vegetation contributes something worth preserving.

For a smaller parcel, selective decisions can have a noticeable effect on the finished setting.

The most useful approach would begin with understanding the present condition rather than assuming that previous clearing has resolved all site-preparation questions.

Electricity Is Listed as Available

Electricity is reported available, and the supplied data also indicates an electric utility connection associated with the property.

Those entries are encouraging starting points, but they do not explain the exact service arrangement.

They do not confirm the location of a meter, the capacity available, or the work and cost associated with serving a proposed building.

A prospective project would need information from the utility provider.

That inquiry becomes more useful when connected to a preliminary concept. Knowing where electricity would be needed and what it would serve helps make the discussion specific.

The distinction is straightforward: available infrastructure is relevant, while an installed and suitable service is a more detailed condition that requires confirmation.

A Well and Septic System Would Be Needed

The listing states that a well and septic system would be required, subject to county guidelines.

For a residential concept, those are central planning considerations.

Their potential locations would need to relate to the proposed building, access, boundaries, and any other relevant site features.

The supplied material does not include an approved septic design, a completed well, or a documented site evaluation.

Consequently, the property should not be described as having those arrangements already established.

This does not remove the possibility of a future project. It identifies information that would help define one.

A useful early question is whether the intended use can be supported on the combined land area, rather than selecting a finished house design before understanding the site’s practical requirements.

Catfish Lake Unit II and Lake Hillsdale

The description identifies the lots with Catfish Lake Unit II and also discusses Lake Hillsdale.

Those references should be presented carefully.

According to the listing, the property is not affiliated with Lake Hillsdale, although participation may be possible through payment of dues and membership.

That language does not establish automatic access to a lake or community amenities.

It also does not identify precisely which activities or facilities membership would include.

The appropriate next step for someone interested in that possibility would be to obtain the current membership terms directly from the responsible organization.

For this article, the distinction remains clear: the listing mentions a potential participation arrangement, not an included amenity package.

The property should not be promoted as waterfront or as carrying guaranteed lake privileges.

A Residential Vision Should Start With Priorities

The property is marketed as residential land.

That classification makes a residential concept relevant to explore, but it does not establish approval for a particular house or arrangement.

A useful starting point would be a short list of priorities.

Someone might care most about a modest residence, useful outdoor space, and a manageable maintenance routine. Another person might place greater emphasis on storage or a particular relationship between indoor and outdoor areas.

Those preferences help guide the questions asked about the site.

They also prevent the design process from becoming a collection of unrelated ideas.

Once the essential needs are clear, the property’s confirmed dimensions and service requirements can help determine whether the concept fits.

Making Outdoor Space Work Purposefully

On a parcel of this approximate size, outdoor planning benefits from a clear purpose.

A lawn, garden, seating area, and access route all serve different needs. Trying to maximize every element may create a more crowded result than intended.

A coordinated plan could instead focus on the activities the owner values most.

For some people, that may mean room for planting. For others, it could mean a smaller outdoor area that is straightforward to maintain.

These are design possibilities, not verified features of the property.

Their relevance is in showing how a modest land area can be considered thoughtfully.

The most successful layout would allow the essential functions to work together while preserving enough space for the property to feel comfortable.

Asking Price and Reported Taxes

The asking price is listed at $12,500.

Retrieved listing information also reports annual property taxes of $27.

Those figures are useful to identify, but they should not be treated as a complete account of ownership or project costs.

The asking price relates to the land offering. It does not include an assumed budget for a well, septic installation, electrical service, or future construction.

Similarly, a reported tax figure should be checked against current records, including whether it covers all three lots together.

A straightforward presentation keeps the advertised price visible without implying that it represents the entire cost of carrying out a particular plan.

What a Property Visit Could Clarify

A visit can connect the written description with the experience of the site.

It could help someone understand the road relationship, the apparent arrangement of the lots, and the extent of the previously cleared areas.

It may also make personal priorities clearer.

A location can look suitable on a map yet feel different in person. Someone may discover that a simpler layout would work better, or that a feature they had overlooked deserves attention.

A visit should be arranged with the appropriate permission and should not replace documentary confirmation of boundaries.

Its value is observational.

The combination of records and firsthand understanding gives a more useful picture than either alone.

Keeping the Listing Accurate and Useful

Several distinctions make this property easier to understand.

It is approximately 0.57 acres, rather than sixty acres.

It is an offering of three adjoining lots, rather than a verified promise of three buildable homesites.

Electricity is reported available, while well and septic arrangements remain future requirements.

Lake Hillsdale participation is described as a possible membership option, rather than an automatic right included with ownership.

These distinctions do not need to make the description negative.

They give readers a more precise account of what makes the property interesting and what remains to be established.

Clear information helps an interested person focus on the right questions.

A Small Land Offering With Specific Possibilities

The Cheryl Lane listing brings together three adjoining lots, a $12,500 asking price, some reported previous clearing, and electricity availability in the Lumberton area.

Its scale may appeal to someone interested in a focused residential land project rather than a large rural acreage.

The practical picture includes the need to investigate well and septic feasibility, confirm the recorded lot arrangement, and understand any rules or optional membership terms.

The central opportunity is therefore specific: a smaller land offering whose suitability depends on matching a clear plan with verified property information.

For readers interested in this part of Mississippi, the next meaningful step would be learning how the three lots fit together on the ground and whether that arrangement supports the use they have in mind.

From Zillow