Affordable Homes
Wow! Only $4,500 for 0.54 wooded acres in Middleton, Tennessee. Could this be the starting point for your dream property?
Wow! Only $4,500 for 0.54 wooded acres in Middleton, Tennessee. Could this be the starting point for your dream property?

Wooded Half-Acre Lot in Middleton, Tennessee, Listed for $4,500
For buyers interested in a smaller parcel of Tennessee land, 36 Old Roger Springs Rd, Middleton, TN 38052, offers an opportunity to investigate. Listed at $4,500, the property includes approximately 0.54 acres within Woodrun Subdivision.
The supplied listing identifies the parcel as vacant, unimproved land, with topography described as level and wooded. Water is advertised as available, while the zoning field is listed as R. These details provide a starting point for buyers considering land ownership, but they do not establish an approved building site or a completed residential setup.
With limited information in the advertisement, the most useful approach is to understand what is known and identify the questions that remain. The asking price may attract attention, but the property’s suitability will depend on its boundaries, access, subdivision requirements, and the buyer’s intended use.
A Vacant Parcel in Middleton, Tennessee
The property is located in the Middleton region of Tennessee, with the listing address given as 36 Old Roger Springs Rd.
Although the advertisement contains the automated phrase “this home is located,” the property type is clearly identified as unimproved land. No house, cabin, or other residential structure is described.
That distinction is important when evaluating the offering. Buyers are considering a parcel of land rather than an existing residence with rooms, appliances, or household systems.
The address provides a location for further investigation, but a showing and review of property records are necessary to understand the site itself. Those steps can help establish how the parcel relates to the road and neighboring properties.
Approximately 0.54 Acres of Land
The lot is advertised as 0.54 acres, making it slightly larger than half an acre. That equals approximately 23,522 square feet, based on the stated acreage.
This conversion gives readers another way to understand the size, but it does not establish the lot’s exact measurements or shape. The dimensions field repeats the acreage rather than providing frontage and depth.
Buyers should obtain a parcel map or survey to see the actual configuration. A long, narrow lot can function differently from a more regularly shaped parcel of the same area.
Understanding the boundary layout is especially useful when considering access, setbacks, and the possible placement of improvements.
An Asking Price of $4,500
The advertised $4,500 asking price is a central feature of this listing. For someone exploring land ownership, it may be a reason to take a closer look.
However, the asking price should be considered separately from the total cost of purchasing and using the property. Closing expenses, inspections, surveys, utility work, and other items may be relevant depending on the transaction and intended use.
The supplied listing does not provide estimates for those costs. Buyers should therefore avoid assuming that the advertised price represents the full financial commitment.
A clear budget can help establish whether the property remains suitable after the necessary research and any proposed improvements are taken into account.
Level Topography Is an Advertised Feature
The topography is described as level, a detail that may interest buyers comparing parcels with different terrain.
A level appearance can make it easier to visualize the land during an initial visit. Nevertheless, the description does not establish drainage conditions, soil suitability, or readiness for construction.
Buyers should inspect the ground and investigate any site characteristics relevant to their plans. Even a parcel without obvious slopes can require preparation before a particular use is practical.
The useful takeaway is that the listing describes relatively level terrain. More detailed conclusions should come from the site itself and any appropriate professional evaluation, rather than from the topography field alone.
A Wooded Setting With Existing Vegetation
The parcel is also described as wooded, giving it a natural feature that may appeal to buyers who prefer trees around a potential homesite or other permitted improvement.
The listing does not identify tree species, vegetation density, or the condition of individual trees. It also does not include photographs or descriptions detailed enough to establish how much clearing a project might require.
A visit can help buyers understand the existing landscape and decide which features they would want to preserve.
Before removing vegetation, it is important to confirm boundaries and investigate any applicable requirements. Planning around the actual trees and site conditions can produce a more informed approach than assuming the parcel is ready for immediate clearing.
Located Within Woodrun Subdivision
The property is identified as part of Woodrun Subdivision. That is an important detail because a subdivision location may involve documents or requirements relevant to ownership and use.
The supplied listing does not provide subdivision covenants, architectural standards, association information, or a schedule of dues.
Buyers should request the applicable records rather than assume that no restrictions or expenses exist simply because the advertisement does not describe them.
Those documents may help answer questions about structures, lot maintenance, access, or other planned activities. Understanding them early can prevent a buyer from developing ideas that do not fit the parcel’s actual conditions.
Residential Zoning Needs Further Clarification
The zoning field is listed as R, without a more detailed explanation in the supplied material.
Buyers should verify the meaning of that designation and how it applies to this specific parcel. A short zoning label does not establish approval for every type of residence, accessory structure, or temporary use.
Anyone considering a future home should investigate the applicable requirements before selecting a design or making assumptions about building eligibility.
The same approach applies to other ideas. A buyer interested in a particular structure or activity should ask about that exact proposal, using the parcel information to ensure the answer relates to the correct property.
Water Is Advertised as Available
The utilities section identifies water available. This is a useful point to investigate, but it does not confirm an installed connection serving a proposed building site.
The listing does not identify the provider, connection location, meter status, capacity, or fees.
Buyers should contact the relevant service provider to determine what is available and what work would be needed. A written estimate may help establish the practical implications for a future project.
Availability and installation are separate considerations. Clarifying both gives buyers a stronger basis for planning than treating a utility entry as confirmation that the land already has a functioning residential water supply.
Other Utility Arrangements Are Not Described
The supplied listing does not identify electrical service, sewer service, or an installed septic system.
That absence does not establish whether those services are possible or impossible. It means their status needs to be investigated.
For a buyer considering construction, utility research should be tied to the intended use. Water, wastewater, electricity, and any desired communications services may each involve different providers or requirements.
The advertisement does not provide a utility plan or installation budget. Buyers should obtain property-specific information before assuming that a particular project can be served.
Resolving these questions early can help prevent a low acquisition price from overshadowing important practical expenses.
A Possible Homesite Requires Verification
A wooded, level parcel within a subdivision may encourage buyers to imagine a future residence. However, the supplied information does not confirm that this lot has an approved building site.
The feasibility of a home would depend on factors that need further review, including the parcel’s shape, applicable setbacks, utility arrangements, and subdivision requirements.
A buyer should first establish those conditions and then consider whether a proposed design fits.
The listing is best understood as an opportunity to investigate land ownership rather than a promise of immediate construction. That distinction allows buyers to explore possibilities while keeping their plans connected to verified information.
Confirm Road Access and Frontage
The address places the parcel on Old Roger Springs Road, but the supplied facts do not describe road frontage, the access point, or road-maintenance arrangements.
Buyers should verify how the property can legally and practically be reached. They should also establish whether an entrance exists or whether one would need to be created.
These questions matter for both occasional visits and any future improvement project.
A showing can help reveal the physical approach, while relevant records can clarify access rights. The road name alone should not replace confirmation of the route and the conditions associated with using it.
Review the Parcel and Boundary Information
The parcel number is listed as 170J A 002.00. This identifier can help buyers and their representatives confirm that they are reviewing the correct property.
A survey or appropriate boundary information can show the lot’s configuration and relationship to adjacent parcels.
For wooded land, boundaries may not be obvious on the ground. Buyers should avoid relying on nearby fences, cleared areas, or informal markers without verification.
Knowing the limits of ownership helps with decisions about clearing, maintenance, and possible improvements. It also provides a clearer understanding of what the advertised 0.54 acres includes.
Reported Taxes and Assessed Value
The listing reports an annual property-tax amount of $5 and a tax-assessed value of $1,200.
Because the advertised annual tax figure is unusually low, buyers should verify it directly against current records. They should also ask whether any additional assessments, subdivision charges, or other ownership expenses apply.
The assessed value is separate from the asking price and should not be treated as an appraisal of the property’s current market value.
Future costs should not be assumed to remain identical to the listing figures. A complete ownership budget should be based on confirmed information relevant to the buyer and the intended transaction.
A Practical Approach for First-Time Land Buyers
A smaller parcel can be a useful starting point for someone learning how land purchases differ from buying an existing home.
This listing illustrates the importance of looking beyond price and acreage. Boundaries, access, utilities, and use requirements all help determine what a buyer is actually acquiring.
A sensible first step is to define the purpose of the purchase. Someone considering a future home will have different questions from someone interested in holding vacant land.
Clear goals make the research more focused. They also help a buyer determine whether the parcel’s verified characteristics support the reason they were interested in it in the first place.
Evaluate Long-Term Ownership Without Assuming Returns
Some buyers may consider the property as land to hold for future use. That approach still requires an understanding of ongoing responsibilities and expenses.
The supplied listing does not provide evidence of future appreciation, rental income, or resale demand. A low asking price alone does not establish a profitable investment.
Buyers should evaluate the parcel according to its condition, permitted uses, carrying costs, and how it compares with relevant alternatives.
A purchase can make sense for personal reasons without relying on a prediction of financial gain. The important point is to understand the basis for the decision and avoid substituting an attractive price for a complete assessment.
Explore the Opportunity at 36 Old Roger Springs Road
At the supplied asking price of $4,500, this 0.54-acre parcel in Middleton, Tennessee, offers wooded surroundings, advertised level topography, and water availability within Woodrun Subdivision.
Its smaller size may suit buyers who want to investigate land ownership without taking on a large acreage. Whether it fits a particular plan depends on details that require confirmation.
A showing, boundary review, utility inquiry, and examination of subdivision requirements can help establish a clearer picture. For someone prepared to research those questions, 36 Old Roger Springs Rd presents an opportunity worth exploring on its actual merits.
Based on the supplied eXp Realty listing, MLS number 10234406. Confirm current pricing, availability, acreage, boundaries, access, zoning, subdivision requirements, utility connections, taxes, and permitted uses directly.



From Zillow




